McLaughlin

McLaughlin v. Tesla, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20245:22-cv-07849California2,971 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AARON MCLAUGHLIN, et al., Case No. 22-cv-07849-SVK

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE MOTIONS TO

v. EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY

TESLA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 79, 81 Defendants.

Defendant Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”) requests that the Court exclude the testimony of Plaintiffs’ experts Drs. Anthony Andre and Timothy Fratto. See Dkts. 79, 81 (the “Motions”). The Parties appeared for a hearing on the Motions on September 5, 2024. All necessary parties—Plaintiffs and Tesla—have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. See Dkts. 6-7. After considering the Parties’ briefing, relevant law and the record in this action, and after hearing oral argument, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the request to exclude Dr. Andre’s testimony and DENIES the request to exclude Dr. Fratto’s testimony. The Court’s reasoning is set forth below. I. DR. ANDRE Tesla seeks to limit the testimony of Dr. Andre, Plaintiffs’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.