Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Apple, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, Case No. 22-cv-04806-YGR(LB)

LLC,

12 Plaintiff, DISCOVERY ORDER 13 v. Re: ECF No. 84

APPLE, INC.,

15 Defendant. 16 The parties dispute the sufficiency of Apple’s responses interrogatories 1 through 3 and 11.1 Apple’s responses to 1 through 3 are sufficient, and there isn’t a live dispute regarding Interrogatory 11 because the parties have agreed that Apple will produce licensing agreements until after the district judge issues a protective order for this case.2 First, Interrogatory Nos. 1 and 2 seek information about Apple’s alleged accused products. Interrogatory No. 1 seeks the name and model number of each accused product, and Interrogatory No. 2 seeks identification of their components recited in claim 4 of the ’949 patent. GTP contends that “Apple has refused to provide a candid narrative answer” for the requested information. GTP wants Apple to “provide a chart listing the…