Miguel

Miguel v. Yue

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20243:23-cv-06350California1,233 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPH MIGUEL, Case No. 23-cv-06350-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE;

v. GRANTING UNION CITY'S MOTION

FOR JUDGMENT ON PLEADINGS;

KATIE YUE, et al., AFFORDING PLAINTIFF LIMITED

LEAVE TO AMEND; VACATING

Defendants. HEARING

12 Before the Court is the "Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings," filed August 16, 2024, by defendants City of Union City and Union City Police Department's (collectively, "Union City"). On September 7, 2024, plaintiff Joseph Miguel ("Miguel"), who proceeds pro se, filed a "Motion for Continuance." Having read and considered the above-referenced papers filed by the parties, the Court deems the matters suitable for decision thereon, VACATES the hearing scheduled for September 27, 2024, and rules as follows. 1. Miguel's motion for a continuance is hereby DENIED. According to plaintiff, he …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.