Resh, Inc v. Skimlite Manufacturing Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 20245:22-cv-01427California6,932 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 RESH, INC., Case No. 22-cv-01427-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

BARRETT CONRAD, et al., Re: ECF No. 102 Defendants.

13 This patent infringement action involves two manufacturers of telescoping poles used to clean swimming poles. Plaintiff Resh, Inc. alleges that Defendants Skimlite Manufacturing Inc. (“RCI”), James Conrad (“Conrad Sr.”), and Barrett Conrad (“Conrad Jr.”) (collectively, “Defendants”) infringe U.S. Patent No. 11,141,852, entitled “Telepole Apparatus and Related Methods” (the “’852 Patent”). Defendants move to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(3), as well as to strike certain allegations under Rule 12(f). Defendants’ Mot. to Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 115. On May 15, 2024, the Court took the fully briefed Motion under submission…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.