Wicker

Wicker v. O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20243:23-cv-04269California6,241 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division S.W., Case No. 23-cv-04269-LB

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING FOR FURTHER

v. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Re: ECF No. 19 Defendant. 16 INTRODUCTION The plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying her claim for social-security disability insurance (SSI) under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act (SSA)1 The plaintiff and the Commissioner filed briefs, and the plaintiff filed a reply.2 Under Civil Local Rule 16-5, the matter is decision without oral argument. The parties agree that remand is appropriate but dispute whether it should be for further administrative proceedings or for the payment of benefits. The court remands for further administrative proceedings. 25 26 27 1 Br. – ECF No. 19. Citations refer to material in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.