RoadRunner Recycling, Inc. v. Recycle Track Systems, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20244:23-cv-04804California1,259 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROADRUNNER RECYCLING, INC., Plaintiff, No. C 23-04804 WHA

v.

RECYCLE TRACK SYSTEMS, INC. and ORDER RE MOTIONS TO SEAL

RECYCLESMART SOLUTIONS, INC.,

14 Defendants.

16 This order addresses the motions to seal and supporting declarations (Dkt. Nos. 95, 98, 101, 105, 109, 110) that stem from the recent discovery dispute (Dkt. Nos. 94, 99–100, 102). 1. THE LEGAL STANDARD. The public enjoys the right to know to whom the public courts provide relief (or not). Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178–80 (9th Cir. 2006). Filings “more than tangentially related to the merits of a case” may be sealed only for “compelling reasons.” Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1101–02 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 580 U.S. 815 (2016). That “standard applies to most judicial records,” with a “good cause” standard applying otherwise. Id. at 1098 (quoting Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677–78 (9th Cir. 2010),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.