Dickerson
Dickerson v. Macmillan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRENNA DICKERSON, Case No. 23-cv-01320-AMO
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS AND GRANTING
v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO
SEAL
ANDY MACMILLAN, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 31, 41, 42, 48, 52 Defendants.
12 Defendants’ motion to dismiss this PSLRA case was heard before this Court on March 14, 2024. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments therein and those made at the hearing, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion for the following reasons. Also before the Court are four administrative motions to seal. ECF 31, 41, 48, 52; see ECF 59. For the reasons stated below, the Court hereby GRANTS the administrative motions to seal. I. BACKGROUND1 A. Factual Background Defendant UserTesting is a company that went public on November 17, 2021, at $14 per share. First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (ECF 32) ¶¶ 14, 34. Following its…