M.G.

M.G. v. Therapymatch, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20243:23-cv-04422California5,517 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 M.G., Case No. 23-cv-04422-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS

THERAPYMATCH, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 20 Defendant.

12 This is a data privacy lawsuit. Therapymatch, Inc.’s motion to dismiss was heard before this Court on April 18, 2024. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments therein and those made at the hearing, together with the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Defendant Therapymatch, Inc. d/b/a Headway (“Headway”) is a private company that has an online platform to provide users with access to mental health providers. First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (ECF 17) ¶ 2. The website allows users to search Headway’s clinician database based on specified preferences regarding language, race, ethnicity, gender,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.