Brown

Brown v. City of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20244:24-cv-00466California1,528 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division JANET BROWN, Case No. 24-cv-00466-LB

Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING SERVICE AND

JURISDICTION

v. Re: ECF Nos. 1, 9 CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. 16 The plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendants on January 25, 2024.1 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), a plaintiff has 90 days to serve the complaint and summons on a defendant. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), 6(a)(1)(C). The defendants are (1) the City of San Francisco, (2) “David G. Winford and/or Alla Urisman, Trustees, et al,” and (3) Derik N. Lewis, Esq.2 The plaintiff’s proof of service shows service on (1) California Secretary of State Shirley N. Weber, Ph.D., (2) ZBS Law 22 Firm; and (3) Vantis Law Firm.3 The State Bar’s website lists Mr. Lewis as an attorney at Vantis. The complaint alleges that “[t]his suit originates from the actions of the Superior Court of 24

1 Compl. – ECF No. 1. Citations refer to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.