Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20245:22-cv-04844California1,766 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-04844-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., CONSIDER WHETHER

DEFENDANTS’ MATERIALS SHOULD

Defendants. BE SEALED, AND GRANTING IN

PART AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE

MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

12 [Re: ECF Nos. 267, 278, 279]

14 Before the Court is Plaintiff Nicky Laatz’s (“Plaintiff” or “Laatz”) Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Defendants’ Materials Should be Sealed, filed in connection with her Renewed Motion for Relief from the Scheduling Order. ECF No. 267. Defendants filed a statement in support of sealing the materials identified in Laatz’s motion, ECF No. 279, as well as their own Administrative Motion to Seal those materials, ECF No. 278. Plaintiff did not submit any response to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.