Laatz
Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20245:22-cv-04844California1,766 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-04844-BLF
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
ZAZZLE, INC., et al., CONSIDER WHETHER
DEFENDANTS’ MATERIALS SHOULD
Defendants. BE SEALED, AND GRANTING IN
PART AND DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
12 [Re: ECF Nos. 267, 278, 279]
14 Before the Court is Plaintiff Nicky Laatz’s (“Plaintiff” or “Laatz”) Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Defendants’ Materials Should be Sealed, filed in connection with her Renewed Motion for Relief from the Scheduling Order. ECF No. 267. Defendants filed a statement in support of sealing the materials identified in Laatz’s motion, ECF No. 279, as well as their own Administrative Motion to Seal those materials, ECF No. 278. Plaintiff did not submit any response to…