Matula

Matula v. Wells Fargo & Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20243:24-cv-03504California1,110 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS O. MATULA, JR., individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, No. 24-03504 WHA Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO TRANSFER VENUE PURSUANT

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, HUMAN TO 28 U.S.C. § 1404(A)

RESOURCES COMMITTEE OF THE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WELLS

FARGO, WELLS FARGO EMPLOYEE BENEFIT REVIEW COMMITTEE; and DOES 1-10 INCLUSIVE, Defendants.

19 INTRODUCTION In this putative class action under ERISA, plaintiff and defendants have stipulated to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1440(a). After reviewing the stipulation, this order GRANTS both side’s stipulation and TRANSFERS this action to the District of Minnesota. STATEMENT Plaintiff Thomas Matula Jr. worked for Wells Fargo in California and was enrolled in Wells Fargo’s 401k Plan (“the Plan”) which defined Wells Fargo employee pension benefits. 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.