Briggs

Briggs v. Addenton

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20243:23-cv-04919California817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RONNIE L. BRIGGS, Case No. 23-cv-04919-EMC (EMC)

Plaintiffs, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE

TO AMEND, ORDER DENYING IFP

v. APPLICATION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

BRIAN ADDENTON, et al., Docket No. 6 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Ronnie Briggs filed the instant action against Brian Addenton, Aaron Baker, “Anderson,” the Pittsburg Police Department, and Julie Nie. See Docket No. 5 (“Complaint”). The Complaint is dismissed because Mr. Briggs does not identify any wrong committed by any Defendant. Mr. Briggs states that “Brian Addenton played with the court paperwork and had me sent here,” but does not explain how either action harmed Mr. Briggs. See id. at 2. Mr. Briggs does not identify any action taken by the other Defendants, much less a wrongful action. See id. The Court will give Mr. Briggs one chance to amend to state a claim. If Mr. Briggs chooses to amend, he must identify what each Defendant did; where and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.