Villarroel
Villarroel v. Staples, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 PAMELA VILLARROEL, Case No. 23-cv-03717-PCP (VKD)
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE AUGUST 30, 2024
v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE
STAPLES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 40 Defendants.
13 Plaintiff Pamela Villarroel and defendant Staples the Office Superstore, LLC (“Staples”) ask the Court to resolve a dispute regarding Staples’ Requests for Production of Documents (“RFPs”) Nos. 16, 17, and 39. Dkt. No. 40. The Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court orders Ms. Villarroel to produce documents responsive to RFP Nos. 16 and 17, as limited by this order. However, Staples has not shown that Ms. Villarroel should be required to produce documents responsive to RFP No. 39. I. BACKGROUND In this action, Ms. Villarroel asserts state law claims for harassment, discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful…