Ramachandran

Ramachandran v. City of Los Altos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20245:23-cv-02928California754 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SATISH RAMACHANDRAN, Case No. 23-cv-02928-SVK Plaintiff, REDACTED FINAL ORDER ON DEFENDANT CITY OF LOS ALTOS, et al., oONS: ALTOS’ MOTION FOR Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 57 On July 9, 2024, the Court granted Defendant City of Los Altos’ motion for Rule 11 : || sanctions against Plaintiff Satish Ramachandran and imposed a $10,000.00 penalty on Plaintiff 14 || payable to the Court, for reasons fully explained in that order. Dkt. 104. The Court gave Plaintiff || an opportunity to file a statement, declaration, and evidence if he wanted the Court to consider his 16 || inability to pay the $10,000.00 penalty. Id. at 16-17. i Plaintiff thereafter filed a statement, declaration, and evidence in response to the Court’s || July 9 order. Dkt. 105-107. On August 6, 2024, the Court issued an order to show cause (“OSC”) 19 || that addressed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.