White
White v. FCA US LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 MICHELLE J. WHITE, Case No. 22-cv-00954-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES,
FCA US LLC, COSTS, AND EXPENSES Defendant. [Re: ECF No. 57]
12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Michelle J. White’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Expenses (“Motion”) along with a corresponding bill of costs. ECF 57. Defendant FCA US LLC (“Defendant”) has opposed the Motion. ECF 60. Plaintiff has replied. ECF 61. For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees, Costs, and Expenses is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this case in this Court on February 16, 2022. ECF 1. As relevant here, Plaintiff alleged that Defendant violated the Song-Beverly Act by knowingly selling her a vehicle with defects that violated its express and…