Hildebrand
Hildebrand v. Campbell
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL HILDEBRAND, Case No. 24-cv-01791 BLF (PR)
Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
FILE ADDENDUM; DENYING
v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL; GRANTING
TRISHA CAMPBELL, EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION
Respondent. (Docket Nos. 10, 12)
17 Petitioner, a California state prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. No. 1. The Court found the petition presented a timeliness issue and ordered Respondent to respond. Dkt. No. 9. On August 14, 2024, Petitioner filed a motion to file an addendum which to addresses the timeliness bar. Dkt. 21 No. 10. The motion is GRANTED. 22 On August 28, 2024, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition on various 23 grounds, including timeliness. Dkt. No. 11. Petitioner’s opposition is currently due by 24 September 25, 2024. Dkt. No. 9 at 4. 25 Petitioner has filed a motion for appointment of counsel, asserting the “certain 26 intricacies…