Frasco

Frasco v. Flo Health, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20243:21-cv-00757California2,463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ERICA FRASCO, et al., Case No. 21-cv-00757-JD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.

FLO HEALTH, INC., et al., Defendants.

12 In this putative class action, named plaintiffs Erica Frasco, Sarah Wellman, Justine Pietrzyk, Jennifer Chen, Tesha Gamino, Leah Ridgway, Autumn Meigs, and Madeline Kiss sued Flo Health, Inc. (Flo) and Google LLC (Google), among others, over Flo’s use of Google’s analytics services in connection with the Flo Period & Ovulation Tracker app for women (Flo App). See Dkt. No. 64 (first amended complaint). Plaintiffs alleged a panoply of federal- and state-law privacy claims and claims of unfair competition under California law, against Google. See id. at 77-87. After the close of fact discovery, Google moved for summary judgment. See Dkt. Nos. 338-39. Plaintiffs timely opposed. See Dkt. Nos. 348-49, 51. The parties’ familiarity with the record is assumed, and summary judgment is granted in part. DISCUSSION …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.