Charrette

Charrette v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20243:24-cv-06392California249 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DENISE CHARRETTE, Case No. 24-cv-06392-JD Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant. L

This social security appeal was filed by Denise Charrette, pro se, on behalf of her 23-year- || oldson, Anjele Jaame McCullough. Dkt. No. 1. There is no indication that Denise Charrette is an || attorney, and she may not represent her son. See Civil L.R. 3-9(a) (“Any party representing him a || or herself without an attorney must appear personally and may not delegate that duty to any other || person who is not a member of the bar of this Court.”); see also Grizzell v. San Elijo Elementary Z || School, 110 F.4th 1177, 1181 (9th Cir. 2024) (“a parent may not proceed pro se on behalf of her || children.”). Plaintiff Anjele Jaame McCullough will have 60 days from the date of this order to appear || through an attorney who is a member of the bar of this Court. If an attorney does not appear on || his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.