Hankton

Hankton v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20243:23-cv-04051California5,686 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND

I. Administrative Proceedings

21 On September 21, 2019, plaintiff Alexander H. protectively filed an application for 22 Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. AR 15. Plaintiff 23 alleged disability beginning May 1, 2006. His application was denied initially and upon 24 reconsideration. Id. Plaintiff then filed a written request for a hearing, which took place by 25 telephone on June 7, 2022. Plaintiff was represented by counsel at the hearing. Plaintiff testified, 26 27 as did medical expert Dr. Jay Toews and vocational expert Dr. Sabrina Singleton. Id. At the hearing, plaintiff amended his alleged onset date to September 21, 2019. Id. at 43-44. On August 1, 2022, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) Brian M. Steger issued an unfavorable decision. Id. at 28. The Appeals Council denied plaintiff’s request for review, making the ALJ’s decision the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. Id. at 1. Plaintiff then filed this action for judicial review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Dkt. No. 1. 7 II. Medical and Personal History Plaintiff …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.