Bradley
Bradley v. O'Malley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
D.B., Case No. 24-cv-00307-NC Plaintiff,
ORDER REVERSING
v. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
DECISION AND REMANDING FOR
MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, et al., FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Defendants. Re: ECF 11, 12, 14 15 Claimant D.B. appeals from an Administrative Law Judge’s denial of disability insurance benefits for the period of May 15, 2014, to August 14, 2018. D.B. argues the ALJ erred in determining his residual functional capacity (RFC) by improperly weighing medical opinions and failing to account for his allegations of pain, including by discounting his subjective testimony. D.B. also argues the ALJ erred at steps four and five by finding D.B. could perform past relevant work or, in the alternative, had acquired skills transferable to other jobs available in significant numbers in the national economy. The Court concludes the ALJ’s RFC determination is not supported by substantial evidence because he erred in weighing the medical…