Bradley

Bradley v. O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20245:24-cv-00307California4,531 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

D.B., Case No. 24-cv-00307-NC Plaintiff,

ORDER REVERSING

v. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

DECISION AND REMANDING FOR

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, et al., FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Defendants. Re: ECF 11, 12, 14 15 Claimant D.B. appeals from an Administrative Law Judge’s denial of disability insurance benefits for the period of May 15, 2014, to August 14, 2018. D.B. argues the ALJ erred in determining his residual functional capacity (RFC) by improperly weighing medical opinions and failing to account for his allegations of pain, including by discounting his subjective testimony. D.B. also argues the ALJ erred at steps four and five by finding D.B. could perform past relevant work or, in the alternative, had acquired skills transferable to other jobs available in significant numbers in the national economy. The Court concludes the ALJ’s RFC determination is not supported by substantial evidence because he erred in weighing the medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.