Young

Young v. Wenger

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20243:23-cv-02691California3,531 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CLAUDJANAE YOUNG, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02691-SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

DEVON WENGER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 56 Defendants.

12 Now before the Court is defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, arguing that plaintiff China Young’s claims are barred on statute of limitations grounds. The Court held a hearing on September 20, 2024. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion. 16 BACKGROUND Plaintiff China Young brings this civil rights action against City of Antioch police officers Devon Wenger and Erik Nilsen, as well as the City of Antioch and Does 1-50. The first amended complaint alleges that plaintiff was at the home of her sister, co-plaintiff Claudjanae Young, at the time of the incident. Dkt. No. 9 (“FAC”) ¶¶ 10, 16. For the purposes of deciding today’s motion, the Court takes as true the factual allegations in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.