Rowe
Rowe v. Mo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD DAVID ROWE, Case No. 3:24-cv-03113-JSC
Plaintiff,
DISMISSAL ORDER
v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 9 MO, et al., Defendants.
12 Plaintiff, who is representing himself, brought this action against Bank of America and a Mr. Mo. On May 30, 2024, Magistrate Judge Kim granted Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application and screened his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 because the nature of his claims and the basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction was unclear. (Dkt. No. 4.) Plaintiff was given until June 20, 2024 to file an amended complaint. He did not do so and the action was reassigned to the undersigned district judge. (Dkt. No. 7.) On August 22, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause as to why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Dkt. No. 9.) Plaintiff was given until September 19, 2024 to respond to the Court’s Order and warned that failure to do so could result in the dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has not…