Hernandez
Hernandez v. Mimi's Rock Corp.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALFREDO HERNANDEZ, Case No. 21-cv-04065-JST
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR
PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION
DTI GMBH, Re: ECF No. 62 Defendant.
12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Alfredo Hernandez’s motion for leave to file a motion for partial reconsideration. ECF No. 62. Plaintiff seeks leave to file a motion to reconsider this Court’s August 26, 2024 Order, ECF No. 60 (“Order”). Id. Specifically, Plaintiff requests leave to ask the Court to reconsider its dismissal of Plaintiff’s claim that DTI GmbH (“DTI”) breached its obligation to describe ingredients by their common or usual name by listing the omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid (“EPA”) and docosahexaenoic acid (“DHA”), as EPA and DHA on its product. See id. at 3. The Court has discretion to reconsider its interlocutory orders at any point before it enters a final judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Amarel v. Connell, 102 F.3d 1494, 1515 (9th…