Najera

Najera v. Kijakazi, Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20243:23-cv-04293California7,573 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 G.N.,1 Case No. 23-cv-04293-PHK Plaintiff,

v. ORDER REMANDING CASE

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, 12 Defendant. 13 Plaintiff G.N. (“Plaintiff”) brings this action under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (“the Act”), seeking judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant Martin O’Malley [“Commissioner”], denying her application for supplemental security income. [Dkt. 1]. In this Court, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, which the Court construes as Plaintiff’s Opening Brief, the Commissioner filed a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, which the Court construes as the Commissioner’s Response Brief, and Plaintiff filed a Reply Brief. [Dkts. 12, 14-15]. The Commissioner has also 21 1 In actions involving requested review of a decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security 22 Administration, the Court generally uses…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.