Dilliehunt

Dilliehunt v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20241:23-cv-04572California5,766 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 ANGEL D., Case No. 23-cv-04572-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING CASE

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 16 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, et al., Defendants.

13 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) decision denying her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. See Admin. Rec. at 928-45.2 Because Plaintiff sought review in this court following the ALJ’s unfavorable decision, that decision was the “final decision” of the Commissioner of Social Security which this court may review. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Both Parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge (dkts. 7, 8), and the matter has been fully briefed (see dkts. 10, 16, 17). For the reasons stated below, this case is remanded for the calculation and payment of benefits. LEGAL STANDARDS …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.