Dilliehunt
Dilliehunt v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 ANGEL D., Case No. 23-cv-04572-RMI
Plaintiff,
ORDER REMANDING CASE
v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 10, 16 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, et al., Defendants.
13 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) decision denying her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. See Admin. Rec. at 928-45.2 Because Plaintiff sought review in this court following the ALJ’s unfavorable decision, that decision was the “final decision” of the Commissioner of Social Security which this court may review. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Both Parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge (dkts. 7, 8), and the matter has been fully briefed (see dkts. 10, 16, 17). For the reasons stated below, this case is remanded for the calculation and payment of benefits. LEGAL STANDARDS …