Cody

Cody v. E. Gluck Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20244:23-cv-02286California1,327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANNETTE CODY, Case No. 23-cv-02286-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 15 E. GLUCK CORPORATION, Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is Defendant E. Gluck Corporation’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 15. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Annette Cody brings two causes of action against Defendant E. Gluck Corporation for illegal wiretapping under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”), Cal Penal Code §§ 631(a) and 632.7. Defendant is a watch manufacturer for several major fashion brands. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) at ¶ 5. According to the complaint, Defendant operates a website for one of its proprietary brands, Armitron, at www.armitron.com. See id. (“Introduction”). This website…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.