Khan
Khan v. Payton
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MUHAMMAD KHAN,
Case No. 20-cv-03086 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
M. PAYTON, et al.,
Defendants. (Docket No. 72)
17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against an officer at San Quentin Rehabilitation Center1 (“San Quentin”). Dkt. No. 1. The first amended complaint is the operative complaint in this matter. Dkt. No. 18 (“FAC”). Finding the FAC stated cognizable claims, the Court ordered the matter to proceed against Defendants Correctional Officers Payton and Healy. Dkt. No. 52. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, on the grounds that Plaintiff’s claims fail on the merits, and they are entitled
26 1 At the time Plaintiff filed this action, it was known as San Quentin State Prison.
27 2 All page references herein…