Valdez

Valdez v. Naderi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20243:24-cv-01087California4,757 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 STEPHEN CHARLES VALDEZ, Case No. 24-cv-01087-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

SALAR NADERI, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 33, 35 Defendants.

15 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) brought by Defendants City and County of San Francisco, Salar Naderi and Marc Jimenez. ECF No. 33. Plaintiff Stephen Valdez filed an Opposition (ECF No. 44) and Defendants filed a Reply (ECF No. 45). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the September 26, 2024 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion.1 II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Stephen Valdez alleges that Defendants Salar Naderi and Marc Jimenez, both police officers for the San Francisco Police…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.