Hanan

Hanan v. USCIS

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20244:23-cv-02414California12,291 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OFIR HANAN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02414-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT AND GRANTING

GOVERNMENT’S CROSS-MOTION

U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SERVICES (USCIS), et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 22, 24 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 22, 24. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and GRANTS Defendants’ cross-motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiffs Ofir Hanan and Melanie Gillum seek judicial review of the decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) and the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) denying Plaintiff Gillum’s I-130…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.