Bordelon

Bordelon v. Singh

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20244:24-cv-01173California1,142 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHNATHAN R. BORDELON, Case No. 24-cv-01173-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE

v. TO AMEND

MISHYA SINGH, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Contra Costa County public defenders Mishya Singh and Ilean Baltodano. His complaint (ECF No. 1) is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.