Saidwal
Saidwal v. Flagship
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
BACKGROUND
21 On December 17, 2019, Ms. Saidwal filed this case pro se. (Dkt. No. 1.) On February 24, 22 2020, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915, Magistrate Judge Beeler dismissed the complaint with 23 leave to amend. (Dkt. No. 8.) On April 20, 2020, Ms. Saidwal filed her first amended complaint. 24
26 Ms. Saidwal submitted a CD-ROM in support of her motion. Flagship states that it was not served with a copy of that CD-ROM. Accordingly, the Court has not reviewed the materials 27 on the CD-ROM and has not considered them to resolve these motions. Although she is pro se, (Dkt. No. 13.) Judge Beeler dismissed the amended complaint, again with leave to amend. (Dkt. No. 17.) On June 5, 2020, Ms. Saidwal filed her Second Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 18.) Judge Beeler granted her application to proceed in forma pauperis and concluded Ms. Saidwal alleged facts sufficient to proceed. (Dkt. No. 19.) When she was hired, Ms. Saidwal signed a Dispute Resolution Agreement (“DRA”) with Flagship Enterprises Holdings Inc., which provides: This Agreement is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1, et seq. and evidences…