Moore

Moore v. Mars Petcare US, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20243:16-cv-07001California8,165 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TAMARA MOORE, et al., Case No. 16-cv-07001-MMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR

v. CLASS CERTIFICATION

MARS PETCARE US, INC., et al., Re: Doc. Nos. 261, 262, 264 Defendants.

12 Before the Court are three motions, filed May 17, 2023: (1) plaintiff Greta L. Ervin’s (“Ervin”) “Motion for Class Certification” as to claims against defendant Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. (“Royal Canin”) (see Doc. No. 261), (2) plaintiffs Tamara Moore (“Moore”), Nichols Smith (“Smith”), and Cynthia Welton’s (“Welton”) “Motion for Class Certification” as to claims against defendant Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc.’s (“Hill’s”) (see Doc. No. 262), and (3) plaintiff Renee Edgren’s (“Edgren”) “Motion for Class Certification” as to claims against defendant Mars Petcare US, Inc. (“Mars”) (see Doc. No. 264). Each motion has been fully briefed. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motions, the Court rules as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.