Neela

Neela v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20243:23-cv-03489California9,880 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 N.N.,1 Case No. 23-cv-03489-PHK Plaintiff,

v. ORDER OF REMAND

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, 12 Defendant. 13 Plaintiff N.N. (“Plaintiff”) brings this action under the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant Martin O’Malley [“Commissioner”], denying her application for disability insurance benefits. [Dkt. 1]. The Parties have consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge for all purposes, including the entry of final judgment, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See Dkts. 4-5. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, which the Court construes as Plaintiff’s Opening Brief, the Commissioner filed a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, which the Court construes as the Commissioner’s Response Brief, and Plaintiff filed a Reply Brief.2 22 1 In actions involving requested review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.