Hill

Hill v. Haroing

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20244:24-cv-06571California356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CYMEYON V. HILL, No. 2:24-cv-2393 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER HAROING, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, who is confined at Napa State Hospital proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has neither filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 nor paid the filing fee for this action. The federal venue statute provides that a civil action “may be brought in (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this action, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.