Pardi
Pardi v. Tricida, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL PARDI, et al., Case No. 21-cv-00076-HSG
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. SEAL
TRICIDA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 174 Defendants.
12 Pending before the Court is Lead Plaintiff Jeffrey M. Fiore’s (“Plaintiff”) Administrative Motion to Consider Whether A Non-Party’s Material Should Be Sealed. See Dkt. No. 174. Plaintiff seeks sealing of exhibits attached to Plaintiff’s reply in support of his motion to certify a class. Interested non-party Renibus Therapeutics, Inc. (“Renibus”) filed a statement in support of Plaintiff’s motion to seal. See Dkt. No. 182. The Food and Drug Administration, an interested non-party that designated the documents as confidential in discovery, filed an additional response in support of the motion to seal. See Dkt. No. 183. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to seal. I. LEGAL STANDARD Courts apply the “compelling reasons” standard in “motions to seal…