Regal

Regal v. County of Santa Clara

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20245:22-cv-04321California703 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 DEVIN REGAL, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04321-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

NONDISPOSITIVE ORDER OF

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants. [Re: ECF 99]

12 Plaintiffs have filed a motion for relief from a nondispositive pretrial order issued by Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. See Pls.’ Mot. for Relief, ECF 99. This Court finds the motion suitable for decision without a response or a hearing. See Civ. L.R. 72-2(d) (When a party seeks relief from the nondispositive order of a magistrate judge, “no response to the motion is necessary and no hearing will be conducted” unless otherwise ordered by the district judge.). Plaintiffs seek review of Judge Cousins’ denial of their request to depose a designee of Defendant County of Santa Clara (“County”) on certain topics. The parties presented the dispute regarding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.