Ghusain

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMEER GHUSAIN, Case No. 3:24-cv-01863-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

v. AND MOTION TO STRIKE

PETER WEBB, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 22, 29. Defendants.

12 On September 26, 2024, Defendants motions to dismiss and strike came before the Court for hearing. (Dkt. Nos. 22, 29.) At the commencement of the hearing, Plaintiff advised the Court he had reached a settlement of his claims against United. United’s motion to dismiss is therefore DENIED AS MOOT. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court GRANTS Defendant Balfour Beatty Infrastructure Inc.’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend and DENIES its motion to strike. (Dkt. Nos. 29.) Plaintiff’s “fraud and e-signature forgery” claim is dismissed because, among other defects, Plaintiff has not plausibly alleged justifiable reliance on a misrepresentation made to him. Any amended complaint shall be filed by a deadline to be discussed at the initial case…