Geib
Geib v. Jacobs Technology Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN GEIB, Case No. 23-cv-00169-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JACOBS TECHNOLOGY INC., Re: Dkt. No. 33 Defendant.
12 This is a putative class action involving claims of wage and hour violations, which Defendant Jacobs Technology, Inc. (“Jacobs”) argues are barred by the federal enclave doctrine. Before the Court is Jacobs’s motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment on that basis. In accordance with the Court’s instruction, Jacobs did not notice the motion for a hearing. See ECF 30, ECF 32. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Jacobs’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff John Geib (“Geib”) worked as a Building Maintenance Support…