Emelyanenko
Emelyanenko v. Strafach
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STANISLAV EMELYANENKO, Case No. 23-cv-00570-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL
v. ARBITRATION, MOTION TO STRIKE,
AND PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTIONS TO
WILLIAM JOSEPH STRAFACH, et al., EVIDENCE Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 45, 61,
Plaintiff Stanislav Emelyanenko sues his former employer, Sudo Security Group, Inc., and its chief executive officer and chairman, William Joseph Strafach, for making false promises and representations when recruiting him to join the company and engaging in other wrongful conduct. Defendants move to compel arbitration and dismiss or, alternatively, stay this action. Emelyanenko opposes the motion, moves to strike an errata to one of Defendants’ supporting declarations, and objects to evidence Defendants offered for the first time in reply. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court DEFERS RULING on the motion to…