Emelyanenko

Emelyanenko v. Strafach

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20243:23-cv-00570California6,754 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STANISLAV EMELYANENKO, Case No. 23-cv-00570-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL

v. ARBITRATION, MOTION TO STRIKE,

AND PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTIONS TO

WILLIAM JOSEPH STRAFACH, et al., EVIDENCE Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 45, 61,

Plaintiff Stanislav Emelyanenko sues his former employer, Sudo Security Group, Inc., and its chief executive officer and chairman, William Joseph Strafach, for making false promises and representations when recruiting him to join the company and engaging in other wrongful conduct. Defendants move to compel arbitration and dismiss or, alternatively, stay this action. Emelyanenko opposes the motion, moves to strike an errata to one of Defendants’ supporting declarations, and objects to evidence Defendants offered for the first time in reply. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court DEFERS RULING on the motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.