Mattingly
Mattingly v. California Department of Parks and Recreation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MICHAEL JOSEPH MATTINGLY, Case No. 23-cv-03754-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS'
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS JUDGMENT AND RECREATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 39 Defendants.
13 Plaintiff Michael Joseph Mattingly, who is representing himself, filed this action against the California Department of Parks and Recreation (“CDPR”) and nine of its officers, asserting federal and state law claims for violations of his civil rights. See Dkt. No. 1. Defendants now move for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 39, 45. Mr. Mattingly opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 44.1 Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the oral arguments presented, the Court grants in part and denies in part defendants’ motion for summary judgment.2 I. BACKGROUND Mr. Mattingly’s claims concern events surrounding his…