Center for Food Safety v. Environmental Protection Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20243:23-cv-02714California209 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02714-SI Plaintiffs,

REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL

v. BRIEFING ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Defendants. a

A hearing on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment is scheduled for November

v || 8, 2024. In anticipation of that hearing, the Court requests that plaintiffs and defendant

|| Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) file supplemental briefing that addresses the following Q 16 || issue: considering Ninth Circuit precedent regarding what constitutes a “public hearing” under

= || U.S.C. § 136n(b), does the district court have subject matter jurisdiction to hear plaintiffs’ claims? See, e.g., United Farm Workers of Am., AFL-CIO y. Adm'r, E.P.A., 592 F.3d 1080, 1082-84 (9th || Cir. 2010); Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Env't Prot. Agency, 847 F.3d 1075, 1088-89 (9th Cir. || 2017). The Court instructs plaintiffs and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.