Greenlaw

Greenlaw v. Su

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20245:18-cv-04932California1,516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ROSEMARY GREENLAW, Case No. 18-cv-04932-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SEPTEMBER 24, 2024

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE

JULIE SU, Re: Dkt. No. 117 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Rosemary Greenlaw and defendant Julie Su, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor (“Secretary”), ask the Court to resolve their dispute concerning the Secretary’s witnesses Barabara Goto and Michelle Daniels. Dkt. No. 117. The Court finds this dispute may be resolved without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). I. BACKGROUND According to the parties’ joint submission, the Secretary has identified two witnesses, Ms. Goto and Ms. Daniels, whom she will or may call to testify at trial. Dkt. No. 117 at 2, 4. The Secretary identified Ms. Goto and Ms. Daniels as potential witnesses for the first time at 3:00 p.m. on August 29, 2024, the day fact discovery closed. Id. at 4. As no time remained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.