Richards

Richards v. Centripetal Networks, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20244:23-cv-00145California889 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 ALBERT RICHARDS, Case No. 23-cv-00145-HSG (RMI)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTES

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 108, 113, 116 CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC., et al., Defendants.

13 Now pending before the court are a series of discovery disputes (essentially, numerous requests to compel discovery by Plaintiff) set forth in multiple jointly-filed letter briefs (see dkts. 108, 113, 116). The first two letter briefs (dkts. 108, 113) are essentially the same document that was filed twice. The court heard from the Parties as to their disputes on September 17, 2024 (see dkt. 115), at which time the Parties were directed to meet and confer further such as to narrow or reduce their disputes. Thereafter, the Parties filed another jointly-filed letter brief (dkt. 116) reflecting a minor narrowing of their previous disputes, while adding ten new disputes. The court heard from the Parties again at a second discovery hearing on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.