Sepulveda

Sepulveda v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20243:23-cv-03897California777 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD SEPULVEDA, Case No. 23-cv-03897-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL

v. BRIEFING AND/OR EVIDENCE

ENCARNACION PEREZ, et al., Docket No. 35 Defendants.

12 13 The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment on the remaining ADA claim. Having reviewed such, the Court hereby orders that Plaintiff provide supplemental briefing and/or evidence on the issues below. The supplemental briefing and/or evidence shall be filed and served on Defendants within a week of the date of this order. A. Standing At the time the complaint was filed, Plaintiff alleged that he had visited the restaurant at issue, located in Oakland, on two different dates (June 2023 and July 2023) and encountered barriers to access. See Compl. ¶ 12. He also alleged that he planned to return to the restaurant once it is made accessible and asserted that these plans are substantiated by the fact that he lives in Oakland – about…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.