Lewis-Williams

Lewis-Williams v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20243:22-cv-06119California2,032 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GABRIEL CHAVEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 22-06119 WHA

v.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID ORDER DENYING RULE

TRANSIT DISTRICT, MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL

11 Defendant.

13 INTRODUCTION In this Title VII religious accommodation action, defendant-employer seeks to set aside a partial verdict entered in favor of plaintiff-employees after a first jury trial, in advance of a retrial of those issues not reached by the first jury. The motion is DENIED. STATEMENT These consolidated actions went to trial in July. Due to the large number of plaintiffs in the action, the trial was organized into phases. Seven plaintiffs selected by the parties constituted the first phase of trial, which began on July 8. The jury heard evidence until July 12, and began its phase one deliberations the following Monday. The first attempt to try the case resulted in a mistrial: after nearly three days of …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.