Mesick

Mesick v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20243:22-cv-01114California1,898 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DONALD M., Case No. 22-cv-01114-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) MARTIN O'MALLEY,1 Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendant.

12 Now before the Court is a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Dkt. No. 24. Plaintiff’s counsel served a copy of the motion on plaintiff, and plaintiff filed two letters with the Court asking for a reduction of the requested fees. Dkt. Nos. 27, 28. The Court ordered plaintiff’s counsel to respond to the concerns raised in plaintiff’s letters, and counsel has filed a response. Dkt. Nos. 29, 30. The Court has reviewed all of the filings, including plaintiff’s letters, and has taken these into consideration. For the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS the motion for attorney’s fees in full. 20 BACKGROUND Attorney Harvey Sackett represented plaintiff before this Court in appealing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.