Arocha

Arocha v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20243:23-cv-01733California959 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUDY AROCHA,

Case No. 23-cv-01733-RS (PR) Plaintiff, 8 Vv. ORDER OF DISMISSAL CDCR, et al., 10 Defendants. 1] g

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff's second amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint is before the Court for

|| review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). This federal civil rights action is DISMISSED A || (without prejudice) because plaintiff has failed to state a claim for relief and comply with

= || federal pleading rules in any of his three complaints. Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen. Any such motion must be accompanied with an || amended complaint that complies with federal pleading rules and states a claim for relief. DISCUSSION |] A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a || prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.