Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20245:22-cv-04844California2,961 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04844-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE

v. ZAZZLE'S PREPARATION FOR RULE 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION ZAZZLE, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 262 Defendants.

13 Further to the Court’s September 6, 2024 order regarding the parties’ discovery dispute regarding Zazzle’s testimony responsive Ms. Laatz’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition (see Dkt. No. 288 at 8), Ms. Laatz provided copies of the transcripts of the corporate deposition testimony of Ms. Sheu, Mr. Li, Mr. Kang, and Mr. Alkhatib. The Court has reviewed these transcripts and now resolves the parties’ dispute as follows: 1. Topic 1 Topic 1 of Ms. Laatz’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice requests testimony regarding: The decision to purchase the LICENSE, including who was involved in the decision, when the decision was made, what 22 conversations occurred regarding the decision, and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.