Love

Love v. O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20243:24-cv-06590California1,740 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 DESMOND L.1, Case No. 24-cv-06590-PHK Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE: MANDATORY

SCREENING OF COMPLAINT

MARTIN O'MALLEY, et al., PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(E)(2)(B) Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 1 13 Plaintiff DESMOND L. (“Plaintiff”) brings this action under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant Martin O’Malley (“Commissioner”), denying Plaintiff’s application for supplemental security income. [Dkt. 1]. The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [Dkt. 7]. The Court now undertakes a determination of whether Plaintiff’s Complaint must be dismissed pursuant to the requirements of § 1915(e)(2)(B). Any complaint filed pursuant to the IFP provisions of § 1915(a) is subject to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.