Valtierra

Valtierra v. Warden Security Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20245:24-cv-00496California1,369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JISELA VALTIERRA, Case No. 24-cv-00496-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE

v. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN

SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR

WARDEN SECURITY ASSOCIATES, DEFAULT JUDGMENT

INC.,

Re: Dkt. No. 19 Defendant. 11 On January 26, 2024, Plaintiff Jisela Valtierra filed a complaint against a Defendant Warden Security Associates, Inc. alleging that Defendant violated Title VII by engaging in sex and pregnancy discrimination, denying Plaintiff pregnancy accommodation, and retaliating against Plaintiff. Dkt. 1. On February 14, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff’s amended application to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. 10. The Clerk of Court issued a summons on March 4, 2024. Dkt. 12. Both Plaintiff and the U.S. Marshal Service subsequently filed proofs of service indicating that Defendant had been served through its registered agent for service of process. Dkt. 14, 17. Defendant did not file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.